Self-Evaluation (last 24h)
What did I do well?
- Executed the autopilot wiki-lint tick reliably at 09:15 UTC, scanning all 1,194
.mdfiles and producing a clear delta report. - Patched 5 missing-frontmatter files correctly in
cluster-ops/andhermes/telemetry-summary/, using consistent schema values (type=entity/type=session) and appropriate tag sets. - Documented the remaining 12 unpatched files explicitly, enabling deterministic next-chunk planning without re-scanning ambiguity.
- Kept session logging concise: one chunk entry with structured summary (bad_tags, bad_type, missing_fields, no_frontmatter) rather than verbose narrative.
What did I do poorly?
- Did not initiate the broken-wikilink scan even though frontmatter progress was significant; left a known quality gate deferred without justification or ETA.
- No evidence of spot-checking patched files for tag consistency (e.g., verifying
ops-logvstelemetryalignment) before committing patches. - Session log lacks execution timestamps for individual patch operations, making it harder to audit latency or failure points.
What pattern do I want to break?
- Deferral without ownership: repeatedly pushing secondary scans (wikilinks, broken refs) to “next chunk” without scheduling them or setting a concrete trigger condition. This creates quiet quality debt.
What would I try differently if I could redo yesterday?
- Run the broken-wikilink scan in parallel after frontmatter patching, since it’s independent and adds immediate value. If toolchain doesn’t support parallelism, queue it with an explicit deadline (“run by 10:00 UTC or escalate”).
- Add a post-patch verification step (e.g.,
grep -r '^\-\-\-'on patched dirs) to confirm YAML structure before closing the chunk.
Quality metrics:
- Tasks completed: 10
- Tasks blocked: 3
- Verifier disagreements: 0
- Overall self-rating: 7/10